Guide to Implementing LLM Agents: ReAct and Simple Agents
In this guide, we will walk through the configuration and usage of two main types of LLM-based agents: ReAct Agent and Simple Agent. We will discuss their unique features, configuration steps, and best practices, along with how to use tool integrations to enhance their capabilities.
1. ReAct Agent: Reasoning + Action
Overview
The ReAct Agent combines reasoning and tool-based actions to handle complex, dynamic tasks. This agent operates in a loop-based framework that iteratively uses external tools, makes decisions, and processes feedback to achieve its goals.
How It Works
The ReAct approach is inspired by human reasoning and action, utilizing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to guide the agent's decision-making. By incorporating external data through tools, ReAct overcomes limitations like knowledge cutoff and hallucination issues, allowing the agent to update its knowledge and respond accurately.
Key Configuration Options
Name: Unique identifier for the agent
Tools: External services the agent can leverage (search engines, scrapers, etc.)
LLM: The large language model powering the agent
Role: Defines the agent's persona and behavior guidelines
Memory: Optional configuration for persistent knowledge retention
Advanced Settings:
Max Loop: Maximum number of reasoning-action cycles (default: 10)
Behavior on Max Loops: Action when max loops is reached (Return/Continue)
Inference Mode: Response format (XML recommended)
Streaming: Toggle for incremental response generation
Streaming Mode: Controls how streaming responses are delivered (Final/Incremental)
By Tokens: Stream responses token by token
Tool Params: Whether to include tool parameters in streaming responses
Step-by-Step Setup
Basic Configuration Start by defining the name, role, and selecting an LLM for the agent.
Tool Integration Select and configure tools like ScaleSerp or ZenRows. These tools are employed in the reasoning-action loop to fetch external data and assist with decision-making.
Example Tool Setup: Use ScaleSerp for web search and ZenRows for structured data extraction from web pages.
Agents equipped with search tools can access real-time information, improving response accuracy.
Execution Flow The ReAct Agent works in a cycle of thinking, acting, and evaluating results. The agent:
Receives an input query
Determines the necessary actions
Utilizes the appropriate tools
Assesses the gathered data
Loops if additional information or reasoning is needed
Concludes with a formatted response
Testing the Agent Test the ReAct agent with a series of queries to evaluate its decision-making, data handling, and loop termination when reaching max_loops.
Best Practices
Set reasonable
max_loops
value based on task complexityDefine clear roles with specific behavioral guidelines
Configure appropriate error handling for loop termination
Use tool combinations that complement each other
2. Simple Agent: Direct Prompt-Response
Overview
The Simple Agent is designed for straightforward tasks, focusing on single-turn, prompt-response interactions without the need for external tools. It is ideal for content generation, summarization, or any task that requires minimal context and processing.
Key Configuration Options
Name: Unique identifier for the agent
LLM: The language model powering the agent
Role: Detailed instructions guiding the agent's responses
Memory: Optional but typically not needed for simple agents
Step-by-Step Setup
Basic Configuration Define the name, select the LLM, and set up the role.
Role Definition Provide detailed instructions in the role field to ensure the agent’s responses align with your requirements. Example role definition:
Execution Flow The Simple Agent’s flow is straightforward:
Receives input
Processes based on role
Directly generates a response
Best Practices for Simple Agent
Role Specificity: A well-defined role ensures the agent’s responses are aligned with expectations.
Usage Suitability: Ideal for tasks that do not require tool usage or iterative reasoning, such as content modification or summarization.
Reflection Strategy: Use the role section for reflective tasks, where the agent can assess or refine content based on role instructions
3. Reflection Agent
Overview The Reflection Agent extends the ReAct paradigm by adding self-assessment capabilities. It evaluates its own responses before finalizing outputs, improving accuracy and reducing hallucinations.
Key Features
Self-criticism loop for quality control
Can backtrack and revise responses
Higher accuracy on complex reasoning tasks
Uses the same configuration options as ReAct Agent
Best Practices
Use for high-stakes or fact-sensitive applications
Set appropriate max loops as reflection adds processing cycles
Define clear evaluation criteria in the role description
Memory Systems
Memory enables agents to retain information across interactions, providing context and continuity for complex workflows.
Memory Types
Pinecone
Vector database for semantic search
Configuration options:
Connection: Select existing or create new
Index name: Name of the memory store (e.g., "conversations")
Namespace: Logical division within index (e.g., "default")
Dimension: Vector size (typically 1536 for OpenAI embeddings)
Index type: Serverless or Cloud-based
Region: Geographic location for data storage
Qdrant
Alternative vector database
Similar configuration options to Pinecone
Better for certain specialized use cases
Embedder Configuration
Select the embedding model for converting text to vectors
Options typically include OpenAI, Cohere, or custom embedders
Dimension size must match the selected embedder's output
Memory Best Practices
Use memory for multi-turn conversations
Consider privacy implications and data retention policies
Test memory retrieval with various query types
Implement regular memory maintenance to prevent vector store bloat
Agent Comparison
Use Case
Complex tasks, research, data gathering
Content generation, formatting, summarization
Fact-sensitive, high-accuracy needs
Tool Integration
Extensive
None
Extensive
Processing Steps
Multiple loops
Single-turn
Multiple loops with self-assessment
Memory Requirements
Often beneficial
Rarely needed
Often beneficial
Configuration Complexity
High
Low
High
Response Time
Longer
Quick
Longest
Workflow Examples
ReAct Agent Workflow
Objective: Create a search assistant that finds real-time information on the web.
Execution:
User inputs a query
ReAct agent engages ScaleSerp to search
Extracts, processes, and verifies data
Provides a formatted, factual response
Simple Agent Workflow
Objective: Summarize a provided document.
Execution:
User provides document text
Simple agent processes the text based on its summarization role
Returns a concise summary, maintaining a professional tone as specified in the role.
Conclusion
LLM agents provide a powerful framework for building AI applications with varying levels of complexity. By understanding the strengths and configuration options of each agent type, you can design workflows that effectively solve real-world problems.
The key to success lies in proper configuration, clear role definitions, and appropriate tool selection. Start with simpler implementations and gradually incorporate more advanced features as you become familiar with the platform's capabilities
Last updated